|
Volume
3, Issue 5 -
January, 2003
"From
the Right Wing…"
Note: You will see the newsletter the way it was created if you set the
Text Size of your internet browser to "Medium". (On your Tool Bar click
View -Text size - Medium) |
|
 |
|
#21 |
Dan Bylsma’s
Newsletter
--- A Feature of West
Michigan Hockey Camp, Inc.
|
|
www.danbylsma.com |
|
 |
|
DAN’S TIP OF THE MONTH FOR
PLAYERS
Over
the course of a season I get more than a few letters from parents who are concerned that their kids
do not have enough energy to play
three periods of hockey. A typical letter goes something like
this:
My PeeWee son finds
it harder to keep up with the game at this level
and becomes exhausted. The other
kids on the team are also having the problem. They all seem to tire out
by the third period. Are there any drills or things they could do to
increase their endurance? They all have the same complaint. The coach
also suggested that he should probably change the lines a little
quicker. Sometimes the same line stays out of approx. 2 minutes or
more. Any advice would be appreciated.
Based
on the number of times we get this question, it's not an isolated
problem. Three things come to mind.
The
first is the length of
shifts. In the NHL 60 seconds is a very long shift.
I know that we record between 35 and 37 shifts in a 20-minute period -
that's 34 and 32 second shifts on average. If the coach shortens the bench to three lines
35 seconds is a
long shift and we try to keep it fewer than 30
seconds. When penalty killing, we try to
keep it under 30 seconds - 20 seconds is not uncommon. And I suspect we're in better shape
than
the average PeeWee house or Travel player. I can't imagine a 2-minute
shift; - the pain in my legs from the build up of lactic acid would be
enough to get me to the bench, not to mention I'd be gassed.
Lactic acid (actually sarcolactic acid) is produced by muscle tissue
during exercise. When too much of this acid (also called the acid
of fatigue) forms around a muscle, the muscle becomes tired or fatigued.
When you rest, you body clears away these acids. Some build-up of
lactic acid causes fatigue, too much of it causes pain.)
The second
is nutrition. What you eat before a game has a great deal to do with
your energy levels and stamina during the game. See the September, 2002,
issue of my newsletter (http://www.danbylsma.com/newsletter27.htm)
in the Hockey Camp section for what
nutritionists for the Ducks recommend and a discussion on the
importance of how and what you eat before and after a
game.
The third
thing is conditioning. If the only exercise your player gets is
the game or two a week, it may be a factor in why he gets gassed in
the third period. Because everyone on the team seems to get gassed,
I'd look to length of shifts and nutrition first.
One high school player who wrote us
about eating right for maximum performance at the beginning of the season wrote back last week.
This is what he says:
Dan: I have been eating a lot of
carbohydrates. I do notice a difference compared to last year. Last
year I played third line
and had limited playing time. This
year I am playing on the second line.
However, due to injuries and game misconducts,
our team has been playing with only two forward lines. This
means I am playing every other shift. I still have as much
energy as last year. When the game is done I still feel like I could
play a whole new period. Thanks for the
advice!
Thanks for writing back
Landon.
The old saying "you
are what you eat" has validity, especially if you are playing a
sport that demands high levels of energy at regular and sustained intervals.
|
|
THIS
MONTH'S BEST QUESTION ON THE WEB SITE…
Dan and Jay: My son
loves the game and plays with his heart. But when
it comes to playing aggressive, mean,
and dirty he's just not that type of player. He is always very
respectful of his teammates and even other players on other teams.
What can I do as a parent to help my son become more aggressive? Mr.G
Mr. G: I have a feeling that kids who take
to playing the game with violence and aggression (they like hitting and
the more and the harder the better) and are mean and ugly come from a
corresponding background. Moreover, those who are uncontrollably
aggressive have experienced violence for no reason at all. From what you
tell us, if you want to teach your child to become aggressive, mean, and
ugly, you'd have to start beating him, something it appears he's
unaccustomed to. And if you want the message to really sink in, beat him
for no reason at all. That will hasten the process of making him mean
aggressive, mean and ugly.
This is only a game and he loves it as a
game. He sounds like the kind of kid I want my son to become. I think
he's better off concentrating on the skill aspects of the game. The
truly skilled players at my level rarely check. Luc Robitaille had 29
hits in 71 games or less than one hit every three games - this during
the last season I played with him with the Kings (and I think he may
have paid off the scorekeeper for the few he got credit for). A
third/fourth line mucker like myself has to create a little mayhem to
stay in the lineup (168 hits in 64 games or 2.6 hits per game). So my
advice is to allow him to engage in becoming more aggressive at his own
pace as I suspect the more tried and true method of creating violent and
aggressive players isn't any more appealing to you than it is to me. It
wasn't appealing to my father either and I don't think I hit anyone
until I was in Midgets. Hitting is something you can catch on to real
easily after the testosterone starts flowing.
From Jay: When my kids were coming through
youth hockey, I was more concerned that they learned how to take a check
that deliver one and never really emphasized checking. Rather, as Dan
says, we thought the skill part of the game was more important. I didn't
allow checking on the backyard rink, either. I hadn't thought about
Dan's correlation between aggression and a violent background, but from
my experience the ones who were a bit overzealous about checking did
come from backgrounds where arguments were not typically settled by
debate. So I'm with Dan; let him find it at his own pace. If he finds
it, he can be another Dan Bylsma. If he doesn't, he can be another Luc Robitaille. Luc will be in the Hall of Fame.
Mr. G. responds: Thank you for the advice!
I surely do NOT want my son to ever be mean or ugly. By
aggressive I
meant playing a little rougher, like rushing in on the loose pucks and
shoving or even elbowing (no intent to hurt) but to get position to get
the puck. He's 9 and plays on a Squirt B team and even at this level it
gets pretty rough and he gets hit a lot and even checked from time to
time. I would love for him to have the skills of Dan & Luc! Thank you!
Jay replies: One thing you can do to have
him be "more hungry" (maybe what we have is an unfortunate choice of words
- hungry vs. mean or aggressive) is to develop the idea of owning the
puck. This would be as in "is it your puck or is it his (opponent's)
puck." Hockey is not a game of sharing and we don't need politeness or
niceties even if we deplore meanness and aggression. There's only one
puck and the idea is to claim it for yourself and your team and if an
opponent has it, he has something that should be yours and it needs to
be reclaimed for its rightful owner.
The operative words here are that you can
be "possessive" and "jealous" of something that should be in your
possession, and not in the other guy's possession, and it's important to
get it back if he has it or get it if it's free (not in anyone's
possession).
As a coach I used to say, "Whose puck is
it?" or "Who wants the puck?" or "Is the puck worth battling for or
should we gift wrap it for them?" or "The only way to get the game puck
after the game is to own it during the game." or, "If they want the
puck, let them get it out of their net" (after we score a goal).
These comments paint word pictures of
possession, coveting, and jealousy to incite effort and are word
pictures that play on a person's natural inclination to be possessive of
their stuff and do not connote aggression or meanness.
|
|
MY CHARITABLE TRUST FUND...
The
Adam Oates went for $211 and I thank the McKenney family who now have an
Adam Oates stick among their memorabilia. Adam was flattered to
have it go that high and I'm pleased to add $211 to my charitable
foundation. There is no auction this month but we'll have
something special next month.
|
|
NOTES FROM MY HOCKEY CAMP...
My
father tells me that the Day Sessions of the Hockey Camp are full and
there remain only a few spots in the Travel Skill Camp.
I was wrong about
you having two weeks after the first of the year to sign up; you had
until 10 a.m. in the
morning of January 2nd for the PeeWee/Bantam session. We're thinking
about changing the format next year. We're talking of having two
weeks of Day Camp: one week of one session each of Mite/Squirts and PeeWee/Bantams
same as in the past. Then we'd have a second week of Day camp with
two sessions: another PeeWee/Bantam session identical to week one and a session of
Travel Skills - both running in the format of the present Day Camp, i.e.
from 9:00 am to 4:00 p.m. alternating ice and dry land training sessions.
In a sense, this is a
market survey. You are my market - tell me what you think.
* * * * *
At hockey camp
we do not emphasize checking, but in the PeeWee/Bantam camp and the
Travel Skills sessions, we devote some time to checking. We stress
that checking is not another word for "hitting", but rather it is an
attempt to physically check or hinder a puck carrier. Much of what we do
is "angling"; we attempt to force the puck carrier to those places on
the ice where it is very difficult to score. There are times
however when checking involves physical contact. When that occurs
two things are important: You want to do it so it's effective and
so that you do it within the rules.
Let's address checking
within the rules first. You can check without getting penalized if
you follow some simple rules and they all have to do with "down": keep
your stick down, keep your elbows down, keep your feet down (on the
ice), and keep your speed down.
If you keep your stick
down, you avoid the possibility of high sticking or cross checking, and
besides, if you're checking the body, you don't need your stick.
More importantly, try to get your stick on the puck as well. You
may be able to recover the puck or prevent your opponent from making a
pass.
If
you keep your elbows down, you avoid getting your hands up to the
player's head to check and you will also give your own body some
additional protection.
Keep your feet down (on
the ice). First of all, it's illegal to leave your feet to check,
but more importantly, you want to maintain control of your game.
You want to be in a position to recover the puck and you can't do that
if you've left your feet. Remember your goal is the puck.
As important as it is
to know how to deliver a check, it's just as important to know how to
take one. In taking a check, be pro-active. That is to say,
be in the process of delivering back as opposed to recoiling. If
you check back, you will diminish the effectiveness of the checker; perhaps
even reverse the intended consequences of the check. If you
recoil, the effects of the check on you will be compounded. It's
far easier to plant someone to the ice who is already falling than
someone who is checking back. So if you're going to be on the
receiving end of a check, don't recoil - check back!
I'll be the first to
admit that in the heat and speed of the game, I'm not always the poster
boy on how to check. But the picture below shows that I can get
lucky sometimes. And I
 |
post the photo because
there are some things I want you to see (click on the picture to enlarge
it). Perhaps most important,
see what happens if you don't check back. Toni Lydman flinched and the
check wasn't especially hard, but it had the desired effect in part
because he recoiled. Then notice some other things about the
position of my body. My stick is not down, but it's away from Toni
and my arms are down. Notice that my butt is up against the boards
so there's no way I can get a boarding penalty. If I had done the
same check facing the boards, an innocent check might have turned into a
boarding penalty if the ref had the wrong angle on the play. He
might have thought there's no way I could have sent Lydman flying like
that legally.
Incidentally, Toni is
not trying to kick me. He's just lost all control of himself
and, more importantly - the puck.
|
So in making a
check, remember the purpose is not to smash someone over the boards.
It's to check him, that is restrain or hinder the progress of the
puck carrier or force him or her into a position whereby he doesn't have a
good shot at the net (like Toni in the photo).
Things to remember when
checking:
1) Keep your stick down.
Try to keep your stick on the puck as well to prevent the player from
making a pass.
2) Keep your elbows in.
3) Keep your feet
in the ice. Don't lunge into him because your
goal is not to plant him and you but to limit his progress and his
ability
to make a play with the puck.
4) Keep your speed down. You are only allowed
three strides into someone and your goal is not to see how hard and fast
you can lambaste the opponent; it's to limit his progress while being in
control of yourself so you don't take yourself out of the play.
5) Angling the player out of position can be just as
effective as planting him, with less punishment to yourself
6) Never forget that
your goal is the puck. You're trying to prevent him from having it
and trying to get it for yourself. If your goal is just hitting,
you're losing sight of the object of checking.
Things to remember if
you're being checked:
1) Be proactive - lean into the checker if not be checking back.
2) Even though you're
being checked, try to maintain your concentration on the puck and the
play you're trying to make. To allow your attention to be diverted
is as effective for the checker as planting you.
****
There is an active
debate going on to eliminate checking for PeeWees and Bantams because
bigger, stronger players are using hitting (as opposed to checking) to
eliminate the play of smaller, more skillful players. As a result,
the smaller, more skillful players are leaving the game. The
argument is that we're losing the skilled players and what is left are
bigger less skilled players to the detriment of the game and its
future. They argue that in football, at least they line the
behemoths up against each other at the start of the play. They
further argue that it's no coincidence that the smaller skilled players
are coming into the NHL from Europe, while North America is producing the
bigger, checker (some would say mugger) type players (like me).
The other side of the
argument is that we should introduce checking in Mites so that kids
learn how to check and receive checks at an early age so that it's
always part of their game and they'll grow up with it and through it.
The Canadian Hockey Assn. has reinstituted checking for their Atoms (9-10 yr.
olds)
after accepting a study that showed no increase in injuries. The
math in the study was later proved to be fatally flawed but checking remains at the
Atom level - at least for now. The first segment of a two-part TV documentary
"KaBoom" that aired
on
the CBC over the past weeks on the controversy can seen by clicking
here for the first segment (then clicking on "Watch the Story") and
here for the second segment (scroll down a
bit on the page to find it). If my father views this piece, he'd have something to say about the
values the coach has taught his players - hitting is a God-given skill? That
TV segment touched off an editorial in the Toronto Globe and Mail that you can read
here. There's a donnybrook a-brewin' north of the border as evidenced by the responses to the Toronto
Star (you can read them by clicking
here). This will have repercussions in the US. Our thanks to our friend Steve Pesner for the heads-up on these pieces on
checking.
Another argument can be made that checking should be introduced if and
when hockey teams are chosen by height and weight as well as ability as
they do in Pop Warner football - which long ago realized that physical
development is not universally consistent over age groups.
In all of these
arguments, there is an element missing - wise coaching. Coaching
is not super-imposing the pro game onto youth hockey. In my perfect
world a coach with a big or an overly aggressive player would be reining him in if he used his
size to hit instead of check. As I said before, checking is about
physically limiting or restraining (checking the progress of) the puck
handler. Youth hockey is not about proving how big and strong we are
by planting opponents into the cheap seats.
|
|
DAN’S HONOR ROLL
|
I think
your academic progress is so very important that I have an academic Honor
Roll; I don't have an honor roll for hat tricks and shutouts. I hope
each of you are diligent in your studies and can either raise your GPA by
one point, or can attain a 3.5 GPA and be listed here. |
|
|
NAME
|
AGE |
GPA |
SCHOOL |
TEAM |
STATE |
|
Ross
Hinkle |
11 |
3.67 |
Wayland Middle School |
G.R.
Grizzlies PeeWee AA |
MI*‡ |
|
Shannon Kelsey |
14 |
4.0 |
Estero
High School |
Pinch
a Penny Womens League |
FL‡
|
|
Lucas
Kelsey |
13 |
3.57 |
Three
Oaks Middle School |
Jr.
Everblades Bantam A |
FL |
|
Cliff
Jones |
13 |
3.86 |
Spring
Lake Middle School |
Muskegon Chiefs Bantam B3 |
MI*‡ |
|
Marshall Jones |
11 |
4.0 |
Spring
Lake Intermediate |
Lakeshore House - Bonners |
MI*‡ |
|
Brad
Christiansen |
11 |
3.83 |
White Pines Middle School |
Norton Shores (Vers. Fab)
PeeWee |
MI*‡ |
|
Winston Jones |
9 |
3.9 |
Holmes
Elementary School |
Shoreline Rec League Squirt |
MI*‡ |
|
Brandan Ryfiak |
11 |
3.538 |
N.
Rockford Middle School |
Rockford PeeWee |
MI*‡ |
|
Marshall Jones |
11 |
4.0 |
Spring
Lake Intermediate |
Lakeshore House - Bonners |
MI*‡ |
|
Ryan
Christiansen |
8 |
TR |
Peach Plains Elementary |
G. H. Plastics Mite
In-line |
MI‡ |
|
Jeremy
Hopersberger |
11 |
4.0 |
Laingsberg Middle School |
Lansing Capitals PeeWee A |
MI*‡ |
|
Andrew Frank |
8 |
3.67 |
Eagle
Lake Elementary |
Irish Rover Mite A |
MI |
|
Paul
Engman |
12 |
3.72 |
E. Rockford Middle School |
Rockford PeeWee |
MI*‡ |
|
Aaron
Arkema |
8 |
4.0 |
Kettle Lake Elementary |
GRAHA Griffins Mite AA |
MI*‡ |
|
Matt
Rosenthal |
11 |
3.75 |
Chapparel Elementary |
Calababas Flyers PeeWee |
CA*‡ |
|
Ryan
Corgan |
14 |
4.0 |
North Muskegon Middle |
Muskegon Chiefs Bantam B1 |
MI*‡ |
|
Josh
Corgan |
10 |
4.0 |
North Muskegon Elementary |
Muskegon Chiefs Squirt AA
|
MI*‡ |
|
Caleb
Weiler |
9 |
3.87 |
Calvary Christian Academy |
Hatfield Ice Dogs Squirt
B |
PA |
|
Harrison
Huls |
9 |
3.87 |
Blaisdale Montessori School
|
Ajax Knights A Minor Atoms |
ONT |
|
Sammie
Baker |
10 |
4.0 |
Fr. Marquette Middle School |
Marquette LitiGators Girls 11 Under |
MI* |
|
Josh
Weinstein |
10 |
4.0+ |
A.P. Terhune Elementary |
Ice House Avalanche
Squirt AA |
NJ‡ |
|
Kris Johnson |
10 |
3.65 |
St. Stevens Lutheran |
Lakeland Squirt
Spitfires |
MI* |
|
Bennett Schneider |
13 |
3.78 |
Canterbury School |
Jr. Everblades Bantam AA |
FL |
|
Madison Schneider |
9 |
4.0 |
Canterbury School |
Teco Squirt House |
FL |
|
Colton
Ritchie |
9 |
4.0 |
Schola Maxima |
Red Wings Squirt House |
AL |
|
Dakota Abramowicz |
11 |
4.0 |
Jane
Addams Middle School |
Royal
Oak Eagles PeeWee A |
MI |
|
Matt
Weinstein |
12 |
4.0 |
Schyler Middle School |
Ice House Avalanche
PeeWee AA |
NJ‡ |
|
Ben Grace |
9 |
3.63 |
Raisinville Ellmentary |
Monroe Ice Hawks Squirt B |
MI* |
|
Jonathan
Koslop |
11 |
4.0 |
Bonita Middle School |
Sunrise Ice Sharks Black |
FL‡ |
|
Andrew
Lawrence |
11 |
3.9 |
Quinton Township School |
Delaware Jr. Blue
Hens PeeWee A |
DE‡ |
|
David
Lawrence |
13 |
4.0 |
Quinton Township School |
Delaware Jr. Blue
Hens Bantam AA |
DE‡ |
|
Reid
Munroe |
10 |
4.0 |
North Muskegon Elementary |
Muskegon Chiefs Squirt AA |
MI |
|
Ben
Bodman |
13 |
3.93 |
Mason Middle School |
Lansing Senator Bantam B |
MI* |
|
Mark
Hazel |
13 |
3.9 |
Pinewood Middle School |
W. Michigan Bantam A |
MI‡ |
|
Tyler
Spiering |
12 |
3.9 |
Sylvan Christian School |
EGRAHA Bantam B |
MI*‡! |
|
Matt
Slowinski |
11 |
3.79 |
Tawas City Elementary |
GSAHA TBF Graphic Blues
PeeWee |
MI |
|
Bobby
Pease |
10 |
3.88 |
Eugene Vining Elementary |
Billerica Squirt A |
MA |
|
Mitch
Hughes |
10 |
3.9 |
Stoneybrooke Christian |
Anaheim Jr. Ducks Squirt
A |
CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's
room here for you! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hope all of you
set a goal to make this list. To qualify you must have a GPA
(on a 4.0 scale A= 4.0, A- = 3.75, B+ = 3.25, B= 3.0, etc) of 3.50 or
better, an average overall grade improvement (or OGI) of at least
one full grade over last year, or a Teacher Recommendation (or
TR) which must be Emailed directly to me by your teacher and be based on
outstanding achievement in a non-letter graded situation.
When you qualify, Email your name, age, GPA or improvement, school, team,
and state to
Number21@DanBylsma.com |
|
|
*
Attendees of my hockey camp.
‡ Indicates repeat offenders. !Wears Number 21
|
|
|
COACHES AND PARENTS from Jay...
Dan's
column last month about NHL practices being fun because they play a lot
of games prompted me to expand on something I wrote about before; that
is, I think most coaches and parents would be surprised at what an NHL
practice looks like. I've written that about 2/3 of it is working on
skating - the best skaters in the world working on improving their
skating. And right along with skating - passing. In my
ignorance, I thought they would be working on breakouts, defensive
strategies, power plays, penalty killing methods. And I'm sure
they do work on these things, but I've been to over 40 practices and
rarely do I see these technical things - it's the fundamentals they work
on, and work on, and work on.
And what do they do
that is both "working" on fundamentals and fun?
For one thing, they
play Keep Away. That's right... Keep Away. One on one, two
on one, three on one, four on two, and five on two. Serious Keep
Away. Why should you waste valuable ice time on Keep Away? The best
reason is that Keep Away is a game. Games are fun. We play
hockey to have fun. But there are other reasons. The players
are sharpening their stick-handling skills, puck protection techniques,
passing, starting, stopping, dekeing, checking (in the sense of limiting
the progress of a puck carrier)... all of these while having fun and
most likely working harder than they would work at doing conventional
drills where there is typically a lot of standing in line.
They also play three on
three. Two forwards and a D-man each side (a/k/a shinny).
They play five on two
around the net as I've described before.
They do passing skill
games like passing at moving pucks and shooting drills.
All of these are games
and as Ms. P. remarked last month, "I was surprised at how much fun they
were having."
So my hope is that you
coaches will structure your practices like an NHL practice. Much
of it fun and games.
Dan has often said that
the best practice you could have was to divide the team up into two
sides, drop the puck, and go have coffee in the lounge. That is to
say, just let them play.
We met last week with
the director of Minnesota Amateur Hockey. Like all old coaches, we
got to telling war stories and talking about coaching methods. He
said that outside of his association, he was considered a very good
coach. His teams were well coached, had great fundamentals, were
disciplined, and always were competitive. But within his
association, he was not very well respected. To paraphrase the
reason for this, he indicated people in his association didn't think he
took the game serious enough because his kids had fun at practices -
they played Keep Away and cross-ice shinny and didn't spend enough time
on defensive strategies.
I think taking a game
seriously is an oxymoron. But I think this coach had it right.
And I think his detractors would be surprised to find that he ran NHL-like practices.
Jay M.Bylsma
|
|
THIS MONTH'S SAYING TO PUT IN YOUR
LOCKER...
"All
that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that
good men do nothing."
Edmund
Burke
|
|
ONE KID'S TRIP TO THE NHL -
current installment...
The
82 game schedule in a very physical game can be punishing on your body.
And while none of us play over injuries, very few of us play pain free. As some of you may remember, at the
end of last season I had my left knee operated on to clean up some
cartilage damage, try to remove a Baker's cyst (one that grows on the
back of your knee joint) and do some other "routine" knee maintenance
(like an oil change and air filter). The procedure went well and the
knee felt good all summer.
It was
recommended that part of the therapy to rehabilitate the knee was a
series of exercises to strengthen the joint, which I did faithfully.
Several games into the season, my knee started bothering me again, but I
was jealous of the spot I was beginning to earn on the roster (again) so
I continued to play, even though at times the pain was only tolerable
with pain killers. The medical staff was certain that while I was
experiencing pain - sometimes with every step, I wasn't injured.
So to play or not to play was my choice.
But,
I'm here... where I want to be... doing what I want to do. So I do
what most of you would do. Suck it up and play regardless of the
pain.
But over the past few
weeks, the condition was getting worse instead of better. So I
decided when I got home from the current road trip, I was going to make sure I
was only in pain and not injured. Then in the game against Minnesota, I
went down to block a shot and took it in the left knee. I played
the second period, but after two shifts in the third, I took myself out of the game.
By the time the game was over, there was a hard, softball-size lump in
the back of my leg at the knee joint.
When we got back to
Anaheim, I underwent an MIR, had fluid drained off of my knee, and
received a cortisone shot. The MIR indicated there was no
structural damage to the knee. That means I'm not injured - I just
hurt. So I'm not skating for a few days. I'll
miss a few games, give the knee a chance to rest, let the swelling to go
down, and the cortisone to work.
So if you see I'm a
scratch for a few games, it's because my body needs some time to recover. And
I'll be resuming the exercises that were prescribed to strengthen the
joint again.
When I speak to
kids, I usually get asked if I've ever had stitches or a broken bone.
The answer is that I lost count of the stitches in my face at 550 and
I've had 21 broken bones.
So, most of
you young players dream about playing in the NHL, just as I did when I was a kid.
But realize there is a price to pay for anything in life that's valuable.
The price to pay to play in the NHL is not only the time and energy
expended to get to the NHL, there is a price to pay to play here, and
some times the price is painful.
As I said in our second
book, be careful what you pray for.
***
Last issue I asked you
to submit your favorite funny hockey story or joke. If your story
is selected, we'll give you a free, one-year subscription to the
newsletter. This month's funny hockey story is from Scott Moulson (he
said he couldn't pass up the free, one-year subscription offer):
When I grew up in the 60's in Montreal,
the Montreal Forum was the Mecca of hockey.
If you were a hockey fan, the two places you had to visit were
Toronto's Maple Leaf Gardens and the Montreal Forum. After
goals, fans in the Forum would celebrate by
throwing their overshoes (galoshes or boots)
on the ice. As luck would have it, the first
game Dennis Hull dressed for in his NHL
career was for the Chicago Black Hawks against the Canadiens in
Montreal.
Dennis's dad was with him prior to the game. He
proudly put his arm around Dennis
just before the game. "It's taken a lot of
hard work for you to get here, son. Tonight
you will be playing in the most famous hockey rink in
the world against the greatest players in the world. I want you
to remember one thing, son."
At this point Dennis was expecting what my kids would call the "Remember
to do your best and I love you" speech.
"Dennis", his Dad continued, "When you are on the ice against these
great players, after Beliveau dekes around you
and puts one in the net, remember to pick me
up a pair of size 12s."
|
 |
So Your Son Wants to Play In The NHL
Published in 1998 by Sleeping Bear Press in the US and McClelland & Stewart
in Canada. HC $24.95. The story of Dan’s journey from the ice rink in our
back yard to the NHL. “This is the best hockey advice since ‘Don’t rile
Gordie Howe’”. "This is more than a hockey book. It's a book about life and
how to use simple lessons and values for success. …a refreshing
straight-ahead approach that makes you feel that you've learned something."
LA Times.
Autographed and personalized copies available at
www.DanBylsma.com. |
 |
So You Want to Play In The NHL
Published in November, 2000, by NTC/
Contemporary/McGraw-Hill. Trade paperback—$14.95.
Thirty-five questions that aspiring young athletes have and Dan’s and Jay’s
alternating answers. Forward by Luc Robitaille. This book won’t help you
play the game better, but we think it will help you live the game better. “I
am making this book required reading for my team because it confirms
everything I have ever said in the locker room and to parents.” Coach John
M. You can read a chapter by clicking
here. Autographed
and personalized copies available at
www.DanBylsma.com. |
 |
Pitcher’s Hands is OUT!
Is finally out!
(released) and you can get it at on line on the web site or at Barnes &
Noble. Published in February by River Road Publications.
HC $15.95. A historical novel about what it was like to be a kid living in
the Great Depression. It’s a great baseball tale. “…a wonderful story – rich
in historical detail, full of excitement, warmth, and humor – a story that
readers of all ages will not want to end.”
"These
father-son authors... made a literary double play."
Grand Rapids Press.
You can read a chapter by clicking
here. You can get autographed,
personalized
copies at
www.DanBylsma.com. And there is a
discount if you buy both novels. |
|
 |
Slam Dunks Not Allowed! - another historical novel is
here! This one about basketball and World War II. Many of the same characters you will
read about in
Pitcher Hands is OUT! – Scooter, Woody, Doolie and Dutchie - are now
on the High School basketball team. "The
Bylsma writing team takes a page from the history of basketball and sets it
against the backdrop of WWII to create a dramatic, touching and often funny
novel." Published by River Road Publications.
HC $15.95. You can read part
of a chapter from the original manuscript by clicking
here.
You
can get autographed,
personalized
copies at
www.DanBylsma.com. And there is a
discount if you buy both novels. |
If you know of another player or his family
who might enjoy Dan’s Newsletter “From the Right Wing…”, feel free to
forward the newsletter along. Coaches are welcome to send the names
and Email addresses of their entire team - we're happy to sign them
all up.
If
you are reading the Newsletter because someone passed it along and
would like to receive the Newsletter for yourself, Email your first
and last name to
newsletter@DanBylsma.com.
You
are also welcome to reprint articles of the newsletter in your hockey
newsletter. See
Q&A # 51
on the website for the proper way to do that.
If
you have a question you would like to ask Dan or Jay, Email your
question to
questions@DanBylsma.com.
You can see the questions asked and answered on the Q&A page on Dan’s
web site unless you ask that the response be
confidential.
|
| |
|
DAN’S ORGANIZATION
West Michigan Hockey
Camp, Inc.
P.O. Box 917
Grand Haven, MI 49417
Fax: 616-846-0710
Email:
Number21@DanBylsma.com
|
|
|
“Remember… it takes three
things to succeed:
talent, hard work and perseverance.
And
the greatest of these is not talent.” J.M.B.
|
|
|